Is it art? In November of 1969, Apollo 12 [ http://antwrp.gsfc. ] astronaut-photograph er Charles "Pete" Conrad [ http://antwrp.gsfc. ] recorded this masterpiece [ http://images.jsc.n ] while documenting colleague Alan Bean's lunar soil collection activities on the Oceanus Procellarum [ http://volcano.und. lunar/mare/mlm.html ]. The image is dramatic and stark [ http://antwrp.gsfc. ]. Bean is faceless. The harsh environment of the Moon's Ocean of Storms is echoed in his helmet's perfectly composed reflection of Conrad and the lunar horizon [ http://www.hq.nasa. ]. Works of photojournalists originally intent on recording the human condition on planet Earth, such as Lewis W. Hine's [ http://www.geh.org/ index.html ] images from New York City in the early 20th century, or Margaret Bourke-White's [ http://lkwdpl.org/w ] magazine photography are widely regarded as art. Similarly many documentary astronomy and space images [ http://www.nasa.gov ] can be appreciated for their artistic and esthetic appeal.